Table 2.
Types of social media studied (N = 43*)
| Social media | N | Studies |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Biswas,3 Chew and Eysenbach,14 Collier et al,15 Ding and Zhang,16 Freberg et al,9 Gaspar et al,39 Househ,27 Kim and Liu,18 Lazard et al,28 Liu and Kim,19 Mollema et al,40 Odlum and Yoon,30 Signorini et al,23 Towers et al,34 Vos and Buckner,37 Wong et al35 | |
| YouTube | 6 | Basch et al,26 Ding and Zhang,16 Dubey et al,38 Nagpal et al,29 Pandey et al,22 Pathak et al31 |
| 6 | Biswas,3 Ding and Zhang,16 Kim and Liu,18 Liu and Kim,19 Mollema et al,40 Strekalova33 | |
| Blogs | 6 | Ding and Zhang,16 Freberg et al,9 Gao et al,17 Mollema et al,40 Nerlich and Koteyko,21 Tausczik et al24 |
| Discussion forums | 3 | Luoma-aho et al20 Mollema et al,40 Tirkkonen and Luoma-aho25 |
| Flickr | 2 | Ding and Zhang,16 Seltzer et al32 |
| 1 | Seltzer et al32 | |
| Web site comments | 1 | Atlani-Duault et al13 |
| 1 | Fung et al36 | |
| Delicious | 1 | Freberg et al9 |
The total number is >30 because many articles studied multiple social media outlets.