Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 13;28(28):4445–4451. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.062

Table 4.

Protective effects of the rIFNα-2b nasal spray against viral respiratory infections (per protocol analysis).

Viruses EER (%) CER (%) RR (95% CI) ARR (%) (95% CI) RRR (95% CI) NNT (95% CI)
ADV 3.1 7.2 0.406 (0.165–0.999) 4.1 (0.2–8.6) 0.594 (0.001–0.835) 24 (12.1–446.2)
RSV 0.8 2.8 0.279 (0.057–1.356) 2.0 (−0.3 to 4.3) 0.721 (−0.356 to 0.943) 50 (−313.6 to 23.1)
Flu-A 6.4 22.6 0.236 (0.153–0.363) 16.1 (11.7–20.6) 0.764 (0.637–0.847) 7 (4.9–8.6)
Flu-B 4.3 15.8 0.238 (0.164–0.388) 11.5 (7.9–15.2) 0.762 (0.612–0.854) 9 (6.6–12.6)
PIV1-3 4.1 15.9 0.226 (0.139–0.368) 11.79 (8.3–15.3) 0.774 (0.632–0.861) 9 (6.5–12.1)

EER: experimental event rate; CER: control event rate; RR: relative risk; ARR: absolute risk reduction; RRR: relative risk reduction (equal to protective rate); NNT: number needed to treat.