Table 2.
Experimental design.
| Group | Route | Doses (μg/pig) |
|---|---|---|
| A | – | – (n = 5) |
| B | ||
| 1 | IN | 20 (n = 5) |
| 2 | 60 (n = 5) | |
| 3 | 180 (n = 5) | |
| C | ||
| 1 | IM + ADJ | 20 (n = 5) |
| 2 | 60 (n = 5) | |
| 3 | 180 (n = 5) | |
| D | ||
| 1 | IM | 20 (n = 5) |
| 2 | 60 (n = 5) | |
| 3 | 180 (n = 5) |
Experimental design.
| Group | Route | Doses (μg/pig) |
|---|---|---|
| A | – | – (n = 5) |
| B | ||
| 1 | IN | 20 (n = 5) |
| 2 | 60 (n = 5) | |
| 3 | 180 (n = 5) | |
| C | ||
| 1 | IM + ADJ | 20 (n = 5) |
| 2 | 60 (n = 5) | |
| 3 | 180 (n = 5) | |
| D | ||
| 1 | IM | 20 (n = 5) |
| 2 | 60 (n = 5) | |
| 3 | 180 (n = 5) |