Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 18;31(5):665–675. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.011

Table 3.

Results of F-test and Hausman specification test.

Panel A: The null hypothesis: The pooled OLS is more appropriate than the fixed effects model F-statistic [p-value] Test results
OPR (regression equation (12)) 58.0536 [0.0000]∗∗∗ Fixed effects
ROA (regression equation (13)) 56.9582 [0.0000]∗∗∗ Fixed effects
ROE (regression equation (14)) 53.9729 [0.0000]∗∗∗ Fixed effects
SR (regression equation (15)) 0.3987 [0.8094] Pooled OLS
SCORE (regression equation (16)) 4.1028 [0.0032]∗∗∗ Fixed effects



Panel B: The null hypothesis: The random effects model is more appropriate than the fixed effects model Hausman specification test [p-value] Test results

OPR (regression equation (12)) 12.0987 [0.0008]∗∗∗ Fixed effects
ROA (regression equation (13)) 11.2884 [0.0008]∗∗∗ Fixed effects
ROE (regression equation (14)) 11.1955 [0.0008]∗∗∗ Fixed effects
SCORE (regression equation (16)) 10.8621 [0.0010]∗∗∗ Fixed effects

Note: ∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗ indicate that the null hypothesis can be rejected at the 10%, 5% and 1% level, respectively.