Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 5;67(1):102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.02.028

TABLE 1.

DC-SIGN allelic frequencies of the seven htSNPs in healthy individuals and leprosy patients

SNP N Frequency Cases versus Controls
BT + TT versus BL + LLa
OR p OR p
−939G Controls 78 0.577
Cases 194 0.606 1.13 0.55
BT + TT 85 0.582 0.93 0.92 0.84 0.41
BL + LL 109 0.624 1.22 0.36
−871A Controls 78 0.712
Cases 194 0.745 1.18 0.43
BT + TT 85 0.724 1.06 0.81 0.72 0.40
BL + LL 109 0.761 1.29 0.28
−336A Controls 78 0.859
Cases 194 0.819 0.74 0.26
BT + TT 85 0.839 0.86 0.62 1.28 0.36
BL + LL 109 0.803 0.67 0.16
−139G Controls 78 0.564
Cases 194 0.567 1.01 0.95
BT + TT 85 0.565 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.94
BL + LL 109 0.569 1.02 0.93
2392G Controls 78 0.974
Cases 194 0.982 1.43 0.57
BT + TT 85 0.976 1.09 0.90 0.58 0.47
BL + LL 109 0.986 1.89 0.40
3838A Controls 78 0.949
Cases 194 0.936 0.78 0.56
BT + TT 85 0.935 0.78 0.61 0.99 0.99
BL + LL 109 0.936 0.79 0.60
4235G Controls 78 0.917
Cases 194 0.894 0.77 0.43
BT + TT 85 0.918 1.01 0.97 1.58 0.19
BL + LL 109 0.876 0.64 0.21
a

Given the absence of significant differences between LL versus BL and TT versus BT (results not shown), individuals were grouped into lepromatous patients (BL + LL; n = 109) and tuberculoid patients (BT + TT; n = 85).