Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 30;36(1):126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.06.009

Table 3.

Comparison of new regionalism in Hong Kong–Shenzhen/PRD region and the EU.

Items The EU Hong Kong–Shenzhen/PRD region
Institutional base Multi-nations One country, two system
Urban governance Entrepreneurial state Asymmetric urban governance (developmental state vs. entrepreneurial state)
Region-building process Five levels of regionness Informal regional society from below – transitional regional society – formal regional society
External forces No strong impact Strong impact
Degree of regionalization Low-level regionalization High-level of regionalization
Mechanism of regionalization Market exchange induced institution re-alignment Institution re-alignment induced by internal and external conditions, instead of the direct result of the first movement
Cross-boundary regional community Mature development Slow development
Regional identity Relative strong Weak or no regional identity
Actors Business sector, state, residents, NGOs, academic organizations, etc. Business sector, state, residents, NGOs, academic organizations, etc.

Source: compiled by authors.