Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 30;28(13):2539–2549. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.035

Table 3.

Concordance between the guinea pig model and bovine, analyzed by ELISA (a) and VN (b).a.

Guinea pig/Bovine Unsatisfactory x¯<1.69 Satisfactory 1.69x¯<2.72 Very satisfactory 2.72x¯
(a) ELISA; n = 63
Unsatisfactory x¯<1.93 36 2 0
Satisfactory 1.93x¯<3.02 0 5 3
Very satisfactory 3.02x¯ 0 1 16
Guinea pig/Bovine Unsatisfactory x¯ < 1. 27 Satisfactory 1.27 ≤ x¯ < 1.96 Very satisfactory 1.96 ≤ x¯
(b) VN; n = 63
Unsatisfactory x¯<1.31 37 0 1
Satisfactory 1.31x¯<2.05 1 4 1
Very satisfactory 2.05 ≤ x¯ 0 3 16

ELISA Weighted Kappa: 0.894; ASE = 0.041; 95%CI 0.813–0.974; p < 0.0001; almost perfect agreement.

VN Weighted Kappa: 0.876; ASE = 0.050; 95%CI 0.777–0.971; p < 0.0001; almost perfect agreement.

a

The analysis included the 20 assays corresponding to the calibration vaccines used to estimate the doses response curve; 8 placebos, 23 non-vaccinated groups and 12 assays including vaccines of known potency or reference vaccines.