Table 9.
Test results of asymmetric impact of inbound tourism development on risk of hotel stock returns.
| Dependent variable: Risk | Coefficient | t-Statistics [p-value] |
|---|---|---|
| Panel A | ||
| Constant | 10.5589 | 18.65 [0.00]*** |
| b61: GTA × Cycle | 0.1058 | 1.34 [0.18] |
| b62: GTA × (1 − Cycle) | −0.0486 | −2.21 [0.03] ** |
| b62 − b61 = −0.1544* (z = −1.7605) | ||
| F-statistics [p-value] = 3.99 [0.00]*** | ||
| Panel B | ||
| Constant | 10.3681 | 17.09 [0.00] *** |
| b61: GTA × Cycle | 0.1149 | 1.37 [0.17] |
| b62: GTA × (1 − Cycle) | −0.0472 | −.11 [0.04] ** |
| b62 − b61 = −0.1621* (z = −1.8702) | ||
| Dummy1 | 1.5857 | 0.42 [0.68] |
| Dummy2 | 2.4857 | 0.66 [0.51] |
| Dummy3 | 8.7422 | 1.64 [0.10] * |
| F-statistics [p-value] = 2.73 [0.01]*** | ||
Note: *Significance at the 10% level. **Significance at the 5% level. ***Significance at the 1% level.