Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Mar 3;135(7):1919–1921. doi: 10.1038/jid.2015.64

Table 1. Demographic, clinical and investigative characteristics of CAD cases and population controls.

Characteristic n (%)
Cases Total 55
Male 28 (50.9)
Female 27 (49.1)
Fitzpatrick skin type I-III (including 10 FLG heterozygotes) 49 (89.1)
Fitzpatrick skin type IV-VI (FLG genotype undefined) 6 (10.9)

Abnormal photosensitivity by waveband (at time of recruitment) 55 cases
UVB only (305±5nm) 0
UVA only (335/365±30nm) 1 (1.8)
Visible only (400±30nm) 0
UVA and UVB 22 (40.0)
UVA and visible 4 (7.2)
All wavebands (UVB, UVA and visible light) 25 (45.5)
Photosensitivity resolved 3 (5.5)

Degree of UVB (305±5nm) sensitivity*
<10% of normal 17 (30.9)
11-19% of normal 7 (12.7)
20-49% 11 (20.0)
50-75% 11 (20.0)
≥76% 9 (16.4)

Atopic disease
Eczema, asthma, hay fever or food allergy 23 (41.8)

Immunoglobulin E levels (Ku/L) 13 (23.6)
Normal (<100)
100-999 17 (30.9)
1000-5000 10 (18.2)
> 5000 6 (10.9)
Unavailable 9 (16.4)

Positive reactions to contact allergens 42/55 cases (76.4%)
Single 5 (11.9)
Multiple 37 (88.1)

Number of patch test series with positive reaction per patient
Single series 19 (45.2)
2 series 15 (35.7)
3 series 7 (16.7)
4 series 1 (2.4)

Commonest positive patch test series
BCD Standard 38 (90.5)
Plants 12 (28.6)
Sunscreens** 7 (16.7)
Corticosteroids 3 (7.1)
Medicaments 3 (7.1)

Controls Total 100
Male 50 (50.0)
Female 50 (50.0)
*

Abnormal UVB sensitivity (assessed by monochromator phototesting at 305±5nm (half-maximum bandwidth)): The minimal erythemal dose [MED] expressed as a percentage of the lowest normal value for MED at this waveband in healthy volunteers of skin phototype I-III. The lower the MED, the higher the level of abnormal photosensitivity. Thus, an MED of <60; 10% of normal is the most abnormally photosensitive;

**

sunscreen patch testing does not represent photopatch testing.