Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):e1900775. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900775

Table 1.

Overview of advantages and disadvantages of different fiber patterning technologies.

Fiber technology Advantages Disadvantages
Solution electrospinning
  • Nano to sub-micrometer scale resolution (0.01–1 μm)[93]

  • Cheap

  • Easy to use

  • Limited materials available

  • Limited thickness (max. 30 min of fber deposition)[96]

  • Uncontrollable and small pore size

  • Limited shape fdelity

  • Solvents (often cytotoxic) involved

Melt electrospinning
  • Precise control over microarchitecture

  • Moderately thick scaffold possible (up to 7 mm)[115]

  • High shape fdelity

  • Solvent free

  • Limited materials available

  • High temperatures required

  • Microscale resolution (smallest = 0.8 μm)[114]

Near-field spinning
  • Precise control over microarchitecture

  • Nano to sub-micrometer scale resolution (0.05–6 µm)[130,134]

  • Solution or melt possible

  • Limited thickness (up to 100 µm)[135]

Rotary Jet spinning
  • Nano to sub-micrometer fber diameters (0.05–3.5 µm)[136]

  • High production rate

  • Room-temperature processing

  • Wide range of materials processing[198]

  • Easy to use

  • Low porosity

  • Solvents involved

  • Poor fber placement control

  • Requires postprocessing

Pull spinning
  • Ambient conditions

  • Easy to use

  • Compatible with wide range of material[141]

  • Scaffold geometry control by adjusting collector[173]

  • Solvents involved

  • Limited fber placement control

  • Lower throughput than rotary jet spinning[141]

Microfuidic spinning
  • Fibers can be tuned on morphological, structural, and chemical features

  • Direct cell deposition possible

  • Slow fabrication process

  • Frequent nozzle clogging