Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Astron Astrophys. 2020 Apr 24;636:L7. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037837

Table 1.

Dipole moments (µ), number of detected lines, table number listing the spectroscopic and observational line parameters, rotational temperatures (T rot) and column densities (N) obtained with the rotational diagram (RD) analysis, and physical parameters assumed for the MADEX LTE model of the new molecules detected in this work.

Molecule µ [Debye] No. Lines Table RD analysis MADEX LTE model Notes
T rot [K] N × 1012 [cm−2] ν 0 [km s−1] ν FWHM [km s−1] T rot [K] N × 1012 [cm−2]
A/E-CH3SH µa=1.3a 3 B.1 ... ... −1.0 7.0 5.0 20
l-C3H+ µa=3.0b 3 B.2 5 ± 1 1.2 ± 0.2 −0.6 6.0 5.0 1.0
C3N µa=2.8c 4 B.3 5 ± 1 4 ± 1 −0.5 5.0 5.0 3.0
t-HCOOH µa=1.4d 5 B.4 5 ± 1 2.3 ± 0.5 −0.7 6.0 5.0 2.3 *
6 ± 1 3.3 ± 0.4 −0.7 6.0 6.0 3.3 **
6 ± 2 ***
CH2CHCN µa=3.8e 7 B.5 10 ± 4 5 ± 2 −0.5 5.0 10 5.5
o-H2CN µa=2.5f 4 B.6 ... ... −1.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
OCS µa=0.7g 3 B.7 8 ± 3 43 ± 15 −0.7 5.5 8.0 43
SO2 µb=1.6h 3 B.8 8 ± 1 25 ± 4 −0.9 7.0 8.0 25
O+-NH2CN µa=4.3i 6 B.9 30 ± 5 11 ± 2 −0.9 7.0 30 11
(a)

Notes. Refs. Tsunekawa et al. (1989)

This slight difference in N (within the uncertainty) between the two methods is mainly caused by adapting the C3N spectroscopic values in the rotational diagram in order to address the blending of the hyperfine components (see Sect. C).

*

For the K a = 0 ladder (see Sect. C).

**

For the K a = 1 ladder (see Sect. C).

***

Total column density (see Sect. C).