Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Mar 17;12(13):14946–14957. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c01786

Table 1. Comparison of the Textural Properties and the Organic Matter Content of C3, C3-SIP, C1Sph, and C1Sph-SIP.

S BET (m2/g) TPV (cm3g) V micro (cm3/g) V meso (cm3/g) pore width (nm) % weight loss
C3 1340 1.4 0.1 1.3 4.5
C3-SIP 620 0.6 0.0 0.6 4.1 14.8a
C1Sph 1650 1.2 0.2 1.0 3.2
C1Sph-SIP 560 0.4 0.1 0.3 3.0 14.9a
a

Weight loss compared to the nonmodified carbon carriers.