Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Res Qual Life. 2019 Jan 12;15(2):463–484. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9697-x

Table 2. Mediation model predicting work engagement (T1).

Outcome: Work Engagement β p 95% CI
SMC ➔ Work Engagement (total effect) .27 <.001 [.12, .42]
SMC ➔ ASCS-W .37 <.001 [.22, .51]
ASCS-W ➔ Work Engagementb .38 <.001 [.23, .53]
SMC ➔ Work Engagement (direct effect) .13 .04 [.001, .28]
SMC ➔ ASCS-W ➔ Work Engagement (indirect effect) .14 <.001a [.07, .23]

N = 165

SMC Socio-moral climate, ASCS-W Applicability of signature character strengths at work, β Standardized regression coefficient, p probability level (one-tailed), 95% CI bootstrap confidence interval (95%)

a

Sobel Test

b

controlled for SMC