Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Res Qual Life. 2019 Jan 12;15(2):463–484. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9697-x

Table 3. Mediation model predicting PWB (T1).

Outcome: PWB (eudaimonic) β p 95% CI
SMC ➔ PWB (total effect) .23 .002 [.07, .38]
SMC ➔ ASCS-W .36 <.001 [.22, .51]
ASCS-W ➔ PWBb .29 <.001 [.13, .45]
SMC ➔ PWB (direct effect) .12 .07 [–.04, .29]
SMC ➔ ASCS-W ➔ PWB (indirect effect) .11 .004a [.04, .21]

N = 165

PWB Psychological well-being (eudaimonic), SMC Socio-moral climate, ASCS-W Applicability of signature character strengths at work, β Standardized regression coefficient, p probability level (one-tailed), 95% CI bootstrap confidence interval (95%)

a

Sobel Test

b

controlled for SMC