Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Res Qual Life. 2019 Jan 12;15(2):463–484. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9697-x

Table 4. Mediation model predicting SWB (T1).

Outcome: SWB (hedonic) β p 95% CI
SMC ➔ SWB (total effect) .20 .01 [.05, .36]
SMC ➔ ASCS-W .36 <.001 [.41, .62]
ASCS-W ➔ SWBb .11 .10 [–.06, .27]
SMC ➔ SWB (direct effect) .17 .03 [.001, .33]
SMC ➔ ASCS-W ➔ SWB (indirect effect) .04 .12a [–.03, .11]

N = 165

SWB Subjective well-being (hedonic), SMC Socio-moral climate, ASCS-W Applicability of signature character strengths at work, β Standardized regression coefficient, p probability level (one-tailed), 95% CI bootstrap confidence interval (95%)

a

Sobel Test

b

controlled for SMC