Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 9.
Published in final edited form as: JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 Jul 1;16(7):1564–1581. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003403

Table 1. Audit criteria and audit guide.

ETAT+: Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment; TEO: tetracycline eye ointment; APGAR score: Appearance, Pulse,

Audit criterion Audit guide Sample Method used to measure % compliance with best practice
1. Healthcare providers attending to deliveries have received training and maintain competencies in relation to newborn resuscitation The auditor administered a questionnaire to find out if the healthcare providers had been trained in basic newborn resuscitation, using the national ETAT+ guidelines. Auditor marked as ‘Yes’ for trained and ‘No’ for no training 55 healthcare providers A questionnaire to healthcare providers (refer to Appendix I) Certification provided on completion
2. Availability of functional equipment and supplies for basic newborn resuscitation in the labor ward and maternity theater The auditor used a simple tool to check availability of equipment in the maternity theater and labor ward, and marked as ‘not available’, ‘partially available’ or ‘available’. Warming device for room or resuscitaire Two warm dry towels Hand washing facilities or hand sanitizer Bag-valve mask Suction machine and catheters TEO available for eye prophylaxis Cord clamps Resuscitation starts within one minute of birth if needed Chlorhexidine available for cord care Baby placed skin to skin with mother All supplies present in the resuscitation tray – ‘Yes’. Equipment partially or not available in the resuscitation tray – ‘No’. Refer to Appendix II
3. Availability of evidence-based newborn resuscitation protocols in the labor ward and maternity theater Audit team marked as: ‘Yes’ if available
‘No’ if unavailable or not updated
A current evidence-based protocol Presence of printed protocol in the 2 rooms (maternity theater and labor ward).
Refer to Appendix V
4. All newborns are assessed correctly and assigned an APGAR score Audit team looked at the patient case notes and marked as: ‘Yes’ if APGAR score documented ‘No’ if empty Baseline – conducted retrospectively on 300 case notes (from mothers) from May 2016
Follow-up – October 2016
Refer to Appendix III for audit tool
5. All newborns with perinatal asphyxia are correctly assessed and managed according to the WHO guidelines Audit team looked at the patient case notes and marked as: ‘Yes’ if APGAR score was documented and the resuscitation efforts documented.
‘No’ if resuscitation efforts not documented
Baseline - 15 case notes of newborns in May 2016 Follow-up – October 2016 Refer to Appendix IV for audit tool

Grimace, Activity and Respiration; WHO: World Health Organization