Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Remote Sens (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;12(22):3803. doi: 10.3390/rs12223803

Table 4.

Predicted-PM2.5 concentrations obtained from Stage-3 RF models were regressed against Stage-1 measured/predicted-PM2.5 concentrations in a linear regression model. The CV–R2 (how well the model described the PM2.5 variability in new locations) described in three different patterns (overall, spatial, and temporal), RMSE (μg/m3), intercept (μg/m3), and slope (μg/m3).

Stage-3
Overall Spatial Temporal
R2 RMSE Inter. Slope R2 RMSE Inter. Slope R2 RMSE Inter. Slope
2008 0.704 4.547 –1.251 1.064 0.486 2.698 –0.749 1.026 0.760 3.677 0.000 1.074
2009 0.742 4.247 –1.104 1.042 0.680 2.255 –0.203 0.982 0.762 3.593 0.000 1.055
2010 0.709 4.330 –1.424 1.075 0.627 2.342 0.137 0.972 0.738 3.628 0.000 1.102
2011 0.821 4.421 –0.898 1.029 0.733 2.280 –0.509 1.003 0.843 3.756 0.000 1.035
2012 0.786 4.354 –0.749 1.027 0.661 2.527 0.073 0.966 0.823 3.552 0.000 1.043
2013 0.764 4.305 –1.093 1.047 0.637 2.616 –0.565 1.013 0.791 3.604 0.000 1.061
2014 0.784 4.140 –1.044 1.051 0.632 2.292 –0.145 0.983 0.815 3.478 0.000 1.062
2015 0.736 3.792 –1.194 1.072 0.579 2.139 –0.026 0.969 0.776 3.127 0.000 1.095
2016 0.781 3.702 –0.980 1.050 0.725 1.964 –0.532 1.010 0.796 3.149 0.000 1.061
2017 0.816 3.343 –0.933 1.041 0.746 1.720 –0.406 0.994 0.834 2.860 0.000 1.055
2018 0.790 3.275 –1.030 1.046 0.726 1.776 –0.745 1.015 0.807 2.775 0.000 1.056
Mean 0.767 4.042 –1.064 1.049 0.658 2.237 –0.334 0.994 0.795 3.382 0.000 1.063