Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Jun 24;582(7813):506โ€“510. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2390-x

Extended Data Table 1. Design parameters for Fourier surfaces.

Design parameters for all Fourier surfaces demonstrated in this work. The functions are defined for the design to be patterned in the polymer surface, where x and y lie in plane and z is perpendicular (pointing away from the substrate). A right-handed coordinate system is used with the origin placed in the middle of the pattern in both the x and y directions. In these formulas, the height of the surface is defined relative to the unpatterned flat surface where z = 0. All At and ฮ”i (๐›ฌi) have been rounded to the nearest 0.1 (1.0) nm. Analysis of the measured topographies for templated Ag gratings shows that the ๐›ฌi are consistently ~2% larger than the design value (Extended Data Fig. 2), attributed to a distance miscalibration in the thermal scanning probe. See Methods.

ย  Parameters Height profile
Figure A 1 (nm) A 2 (nm) A 3 (nm) ๐›ฌ 1 (nm) ๐›ฌ 2 (nm) ๐›ฌ 3 (nm) ฯ† 1 (nm) ฯ† 2 (nm) ฯ† 3 (nm) ฮ” (nm) f(x)
Fig. 1a 25.0 โ€“ โ€“ 600 โ€“ โ€“ 180 โ€“ โ€“ 35.0 โˆ‘iAicos(gix+ฯ†i)โˆ’ฮ”
Fig. 1d 18.1 14.3 โ€“ 600 475 โ€“ 0 0 โ€“ 42.3
Fig. 1g 18.4 7.0 6.4 600 230 210 0 0 0 41.8
ED Fig. 5 19.3 9.6 โ€“ 620 310 โ€“ 180 180 โ€“ 24.4
0 38.9
ED Fig. 6 18.5 0 to 25.1 โ€“ 620 230 โ€“ 0 0 โ€“ 28.0 to 53.1
Fig. 4b 12.0 12.0 12.0 620 520 445 0 0 0 45.9
ED Fig.8a,e 100 - - 1000 - - 180 - - 110
ED Fig.8c 88.6 44.3 - 800 400 - 90 90 - 125
ED Fig.8g 88.6 44.3 - 900 450 - 90 90 - 125
ED Fig.9b 25.0 โ€“ โ€“ 400 โ€“ โ€“ 180 โ€“ โ€“ 35.0
ED Fig.9d 14.1 11.8 10.1 414 347 297 0 0 0 45.8
Figure i Ai (nm) ๐›ฌi (nm) ฯ†i (deg) ฮธ 1,7 (deg) ฮธ 2,8 (deg) ฮธ 3,9 (deg) ฮธ 4,10 (deg) ฮธ 5,11 (deg) ฮธ 6,12 (deg) ฮ” (nm) f(x,y)
Fig. 2a 1,2 17.5 600 0 0 -10 โ€“ โ€“ โ€“ โ€“ 45.0 โˆ‘iAicos[gi(xcosฮธi+ysinฮธi)+ฯ†i]โˆ’ฮ”
Fig. 2b 1,2 17.5 600 0 0 -40 โ€“ โ€“ โ€“ โ€“ 45.0
Fig. 3a 1,2,3 15.6 600 0 0 60 120 โ€“ โ€“ โ€“ 56.7
Fig. 3d 1-6 10.0 600 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 70.0
Fig. 4e 1โ€“6 5.6 700 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 77.3
7โ€“12 5.6 308 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 77.3
ED Fig. 9e,f 1-6 11.1 615 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 76.7
Figure i A 1 (nm) A 2 (nm) ๐›ฌ 1 (nm) ๐›ฌ 2 (nm) ฯ† 1 (deg) ฯ† 2 (deg) ฮ” (nm) r1 (nm) r2 (nm) f(r,ฮธ)
ED Fig. 7c 1 35.0 โ€“ 600 โ€“ 180 โ€“ 45 0 โ€“ โˆ‘iAicos(gi|rโˆ’ri|+ฯ†i)โˆ’ฮ”
ED Fig. 7d 1,2 17.5 17.5 600 600 180 0 45 โ€“150 ลท 150 ลท
Figure A (nm) L (nm) ฮ” (nm) f(r)
Fig. 2e 35.0 1581 45.0 Asin[ฯ€(rL)2]โˆ’ฮ”