Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 16;33:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.07.008

Table 8.

Impacts of firm size on AR and CAR.

Day Descriptive statistics
Parametric test (large firms − small firms)
Non-parametric test (large firms − small firms)
Small firms (n = 16) Large firms (n = 24) F Sig. Mann–Whitney U test Z Sig.
AR t0 −2.479 −.638 .971 .331 171 −.580 .562
t1 −1.358 −.927 .388 .537 136 −1.546 .122
t2 −2.230 −.894 1.286 .264 150 −1.160 .246
t3 −.553 .191 .526 .473 158 −.939 .348
t4 −.267 −.591 .361 .551 184 −.221 .825
t5 −.505 −1.218 .297 .589 177 −.414 .679
t6 −1.184 1.420 3.110 .086 140 −1.436 .151
t7 −.359 .3944 .830 .368 188 −.110 .912
t8 .945 −.452 1.850 .182 140 −1.436 .151
t9 .215 −.2713 .500 .484 176 −.442 .659
t10 −.431 −.294 .036 .850 175 −.469 .639



CAR t0 − t1 −3.838 −1.550 2.631 .113 163 −0.989 .323
t0 − t2 −6.068 −2.446 4.156 .048* 122 −2.085 .037*
t0 − t3 −6.622 −2.258 4.941 .032* 145 −1.47 .142
t0 − t4 −6.889 −2.904 3.402 .073 155 −1.203 .229
t0 − t5 −7.395 −4.117 1.352 .252 147 −1.417 .157
t0 − t10 −8.209 −3.464 2.076 .158 177 −0.615 .539
t0 − t20 −8.860 −3.800 2.152 .150 177 −0.615 .539
t0 − t30 −8.909 −3.802 1.662 .205 164 −0.962 .336
*

p < .05.

**p < .01.

***p < .001.