Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan 13;158(5):1465–1496.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.007

Table 14.

GRADE Evidence Profile comparing infliximab vs. cyclosporine for decreasing short-term risk of colectomy, in patients hospitalized with corticosteroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis


Infliximab compared to Cyclosporine for Hospitalized Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis, refractory to intravenous corticosteroids
Outcomes Study event rates (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) Absolute effect* No of participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Risk with Cyclosporine Risk with Infliximab
Short-term colectomy 51/193 (26.4%) 51/192 (26.6%) RR 1.00 (0.72 to 1.40) 0 fewer per 1,000 (from 74 fewer to 106 more) 285 (2 RCTs) ⨁⨁◯◯1,2 LOW
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect
1

Rated down for risk of bias (open-label)

2

Rated down for serious imprecision