Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan 13;158(5):1465–1496.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.007

Table 6.

GRADE Evidence Profile comparing thiopurines vs. no thiopurines for achieving steroid-free remission, and preventing relapse in patients with steroid-dependent moderate to severe ulcerative colitis


Thiopurines COMPARED TO No Thiopurines FOR MODERATE TO SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS
Outcomes Study event rates (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) Absolute effect* No of participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Risk without Thiopurines Risk with Thiopurines
Achieving clinical remission (CRITICAL) 54/97 (55.7%) 72/105 (68.6%) RR 1.25 (1.01 to 1.56) 139 more per 1,000 (from 6 more to 213 more) 203 (5 RCTs) ⨁◯◯◯1,2,3 VERY LOW
Relapse after achieving remission (CRITICAL) 90/146 (61.6%) 59/157 (37.6%) RR 0.61 (0.49 to 0.77) 240 fewer per 1,000 (from 314 fewer to 142 more) 303 (7 RCTs) ⨁⨁◯◯1,3 LOW
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect
1

Rated down for risk of bias (inadequate blinding)

2

Rated down for indirectness (not truly induction of remission, since majority of patients received corticosteroids for inducing remission; outcomes in 1/5 trials not standardized)

3

Rated down for imprecision due to low event rate