Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;134:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.02.016

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of LAMP methods in comparison with microscopy and real-time PCR.

Reference Method Method Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) Kappa (κ)
Microscopy Poon et al.’s LAMP 96.2% (90.6–99.0) 98.1% (93.3–99.8) 98.1% (93.2–99.8) 96.3% (90.7–99.0) 0.94
New LAMP 99.1% (94.9–100.0) 99.0% (94.8–100.0) 99.1% (94.9–100.0) 99.0% (94.8–100.0) 0.98



Real time PCR Poon et al.’s LAMP 95.4% (89.5–98.5) 99.0% (94.7–100.0) 99.0% (94.8–100.0) 95.3% (89.4–98.5) 0.94
New LAMP 98.1% (93.5 –99.8) 100.0% (96.5–100.0) 100.0% (96.6–100.0) 98.1% (93.3–99.8) 0.98