Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(11):3276–3288. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2693

Table 1.

Hypermethylation of the G0S2 locus independently predicts poor clinical outcomes.

Recurrence Death
Variable (Univariable model) HR 95% CI p-value Variable (Univariable model) HR 95% CI p-value

Male v. Female (N = 47) 0.560 0.216 to 1.45 0.233 Male v. Female (N = 80) 0.852 0.450 to 1.61 0.622

Cortisol-secreting v. Non-cortisol-secreting (N = 47) 2.58 0.996 to 6.66 0.0509 Cortisol-secreting v. Non-cortisol-secreting (N = 80) 2.86 1.36 to 5.99 5.45 × 10−3

Stage at diagnosis (N = 47) Stage at diagnosis (N = 80)
ENSAT III v. II & I 1.49 0.602 to 3.70 0.388 ENSAT III v. II & I 2.09 0.937 to 4.66 0.0718
ENSAT IV v. II & I 5.26 2.52 to 11.0 1.03 × 10−5

Tumor size (cm) (N = 45) 1.09 0.992 to 1.20 0.0739 Tumor size (cm) (N = 75) 1.16 1.08 to 1.24 7.71 × 10−5

Tumor weight (g) (N = 36) 1.0003 0.9995 to 1.0011 0.444 Tumor weight (g) (N = 55) 1.0007 1.0003 to 1.0011 4.59 × 10−4

High grade v. Low grade (N = 42) 3.15 1.21 to 8.16 0.0183 High grade v. Low grade (N = 69) 3.42 1.74 to 6.74 3.80 × 10−4

G0S2 M v. UM (N = 47) 6.91 2.74 to 17.5 4.31 × 10−5 G0S2 M v. UM (N = 80) 2.65 1.45 to 4.86 1.60 × 10−3

Variable (Multivariable model) HR 95% CI p-value Variable (Multivariable model) HR 95% CI p-value

(N = 47) (N = 80)
Cortisol-secreting v. Non-cortisol-secreting 2.51 0.964 to 6.53 0.0594 Cortisol-secreting v. Non-cortisol-secreting 2.43 1.14 to 5.16 0.0208
G0S2 M v. UM 6.88 2.71 to 17.5 5.02 × 10−5 G0S2 M v. UM 2.27 1.23 to 4.20 9.00 × 10−3

(N = 47) (N = 80)
ENSAT III v. II & I 1.11 0.440 to 2.78 0.830 ENSAT III v. II & I 1.80 0.804 to 4.04 0.153
ENSAT IV v. II & I 5.44 2.57 to 11.5 9.30 × 10−6
G0S2 M v. UM 6.81 2.67 to 17.4 5.98 × 10−5 G0S2 M v. UM 2.77 1.48 to 5.19 1.39 × 10−3

(N = 45) (N = 75)
Tumor size (cm) 1.09 0.982 to 1.20 0.108 Tumor size (cm) 1.17 1.09 to 1.26 3.72 × 10−5
G0S2 M v. UM 6.95 2.71 to 17.8 5.33 × 10−5 G0S2 M v. UM 3.53 1.85 to 6.75 1.36 × 10−4

(N = 36) (N = 55)
Tumor weight (g) 1.0005 0.9997 to 1.0012 0.208 Tumor weight (g) 1.0009 1.0005 to 1.0013 2.78 × 10−5
G0S2 M v. UM 7.10 2.55 to 19.8 1.78 × 10−4 G0S2 M v. UM 4.51 2.01 to 10.1 2.48 × 10−4

(N = 42) (N = 69)
High grade v. Low grade 3.38 1.27 to 8.98 0.0147 High grade v. Low grade 3.10 1.56 to 6.17 1.25 × 10−3
G0S2 M v. UM 7.90 2.86 to 21.8 6.69 × 10−5 G0S2 M v. UM 3.05 1.54 to 6.05 1.43 × 10−3

NOTE. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression using available clinical and molecular data from all tumors in the FMUSP+UM Primary ACC Cohort. In each category, N indicates number of samples included in each univariable or multivariable model. The p-value is calculated from the Wald statistic using a chi-squared distribution. Grade is calculated on the basis of mitotic counts, where ≤ 20 mitoses/50 high-powered fields (HPF) is “Low grade” and > 20/50 HPF is “High grade.” “G0S2 M. v. UM” = G0S2 Methylated v. Unmethylated.