Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 1;33(3):e00159-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00159-19

TABLE 3.

Detection of hypoxic granulomas in various species using different techniquesa

Species Caseous necrosis Measurement technique pO2 Reference
BALB/c mouse Absent Immunodetection of PIMO Not hypoxic 8
[64Cu]ATSM PET imaging Not hypoxic 8
C57BL/6 mouse Absent Immunodetection of EF5 Not hypoxic 109
Immunodetection of PIMO Not hypoxic 115
Catheter microelectrode Not hypoxic 115
C3HeB/FeJ mouse Present Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 8
Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 7
[64Cu]ATSM PET imaging <3.8 mm Hg 8
Guinea pig Present Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 111
Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 3
Rabbit Present Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 111
Fiber optic oxygen sensor 1.6 mm Hg 111
Cynomolgus macaque Present Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 111
Immunodetection of PIMO <10 mm Hg 122
Human Present [18F]FMISO PET-CT imaging <10 mm Hg 113
a

[64Cu] ATSM PET, 64Cu-diacetyl-bis (N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) positron emission tomography; EF5, 2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-[18F]pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide; PIMO, pimonidazole hydrochloride; [18F]FMISO, [18F]fluoromisonidazole.