Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230610

Table 1. Demographic data of the study subjects.

Number of samples from different patients and controls, and site of collection.

Subjects Sex Age (yr)
M F Median Min-max Kruskal-Wallis (p)
Visceral Leishmaniasis (n = 128) 86 39 25.5 1–90 <0.001
Campo Grande (n = 27) 19 8 43 a 1–90
Bauru (n = 16) 9 7 16.5 1–59
Aracaju (n = 55) 35 20 9.5 1–68
Natal (n = 30) 23 4 33 15–56
Asymptomatic control (n = 85) 46 39 30 2–67 <0.001
Campo Grande (n = 31) 20 11 34 4–67
Bauru (n = 7) 0 7 32 29–35
Aracaju (n = 14) 6 8 9.5 b 2–33
Natal (n = 33) 20 13 29 16–60
Potentially cross-reactive control (n = 22) - - - -
Campo Grande (n = 7) 4 3 43 25–74
Sao Paulo (n = 15) - - - -
Visceral Leishmaniasis/aids (n = 20) 12 8 36 20–53 0.667
Campo Grande (n = 11) 8 3 37 20–53
Bauru (n = 5) 3 2 43 23–53
Natal (n = 4) 1 3 31 21–46

n–Number of samples.

M–Male. F–Female.

Min-max–minimum-maximum.

a–p<0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis) in relation to Bauru and Aracaju.

b–p<0.001 in relation to Bauru, Campo Grande, and Natal.