Table 2.
Fit statistic comparisons of latent class analysis in the total sample and subsamples
Black | White | Total | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classes | G2 | ABIC | AIC | Entropy | G2 | ABIC | AIC | Entropy | G2 | ABIC | AIC | Entropy |
2 | 493.26 | 617.16 | 555.26 | .93 | 2216.38 | 2393.51 | 2278.38 | .89 | 2704.08 | 3068.57 | 2828.08 | .89 |
3 | 314.79 | 502.64 | 408.79 | .90 | 1183.87 | 1452.43 | 1277.87 | .90 | 1496.83 | 2049.45 | 1684.83 | .90 |
4 | 258.25 | 510.04 | 384.25 | .90 | 934.31 | 1294.29 | 1060.31 | .83 | 1191.66 | 1932.4 | 1443.66 | .84 |
5 | 221.62 | 537.35 | 379.62 | .90 | 741.67 | 1193.07 | 899.67 | .85 | 964.94 | 1893.81 | 1280.94 | .86 |
6 | 199.93 | 579.61 | 389.93 | .88 | 672.43 | 1215.26 | 862.43 | .86 | 876.24 | 1993.23 | 1256.24 | .86 |
Note: Bold text indicates the best fitting model. Italicized text indicates other potentially acceptable models based on fit statistics. Fit statistics were calculated unadjusted for covariates.