Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Oct 3;46(6):1022–1047. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000770

Table 5.

Estimated coefficients from the mixed model on picture naming accuracy

Fixed effects Estimate SE z-values p Lower Upper

(Intercept) 4.64 0.24 18.75 < 0.001 4.15 5.12
Frequency 1.36 0.18 7.70 < 0.001 1.01 1.71
Integrated 0.19 0.30 0.64 0.522 −0.40 0.78
Varied −0.55 0.26 −2.15 0.016 −1.05 −0.05
Language −2.99 0.45 −6.66 < 0.001 −3.87 −2.11
Integrated*Language 1.90 0.50 3.83 < 0.001 0.93 2.87
Varied*Language 2.69 0.46 5.86 < 0.001 1.79 3.59

Random effects Variance SD Correlation

Intercept | item 1.9352 1.39
Integrated | item 1.3005 1.14 −0.06
Varied | item 0.7231 0.85 −0.15 0.83
Intercept | participant 0.2643 0.51
Frequency | participant 0.0046 0.07 −0.15
Language | participant 1.4533 1.21 −0.09 −0.97

Notes. Lower/Upper = lower and upper bounds for 95% confidence intervals of coefficient estimate; SE = standard error of coefficient estimate. The separated-context bilingual group was set as the reference level. Language was contrast coded (−0.5 = Spanish; 0.5 = English), making the coefficient interpretations as follows: Intercept = mean naming accuracy (in log odds) for separated-context bilinguals with an average frequency effect. Frequency = effect of frequency (centered at the sample mean) on accuracy for separated-context bilinguals. Integrated = mean accuracy difference between separated-and integrated-context bilinguals. Varied = mean accuracy difference between separated-and varied-context bilinguals. Bold indicates coefficients that are significantly different from zero.