Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rehabil Psychol. 2019 Oct 3;65(4):455–470. doi: 10.1037/rep0000291

Table 6.

Descriptive Data and Reliability Analyses for TBI-CareQOL Emotional Suppression

Administration
Form
n Internal
Consistency°
Test-retest
reliability
*
% of
the
sample
with
floor
effects
% of
the
sample
with
ceiling
effects
Mean
(SD)
Administration
time (sec)
Administration
time per item
(sec)

Combined Sample (N = 533)
Short Form 533 0.91 0.91 1.1 3.0 50.10 (9.45) 37.55 6.26
Simulated Computer Adaptive Test 533 0.92 0.89 0.4 1.9 49.95 (9.67) 41.94 7.43
Caregivers of Civilians (n = 218)
Short Form 218 0.91 0.90 0.9 5.1 47.80 (9.91) 36.90 6.15
Simulated Computer Adaptive Test 218 0.91 0.87 0.0 3.7 47.50 (9.99) 45.12 7.91
Caregivers of Service Members and Veterans (n = 315)
Short Form 315 0.91 0.88 1.3 1.6 51.70 (8.78) 39.03 6.50
Short Form Simulated Computer Adaptive Test 315 0.92 0.88 0.6 0.6 51.65 (9.09) 37.76 6.80

Note.

°

= internal consistency for static short form measures is reported as Cronbach’s alpha and for computer adaptive tests is reported as average standard error-based reliability (i.e., an item response theory-based reliability estimate);

*

Test-retest reliability is measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; criterion ≥ 0.70)