Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;93(4):433–443. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01492-7

Table 2.

Prospective models for exposure to workplace bullying at baseline (2011/12) and depressive symptoms at follow-up (2017) by type of perpetrator and severity

N Cases Cases (%) Self-reported depressive symptoms (PHQ sum ≥ 10)
Model 0 Model 1 Model 2
p value* OR (95% CI) p value* OR (95% CI) p value* OR (95% CI)
Bullying by co-workers < 0.001 < 0.001 0.017
 No 2026 186 9 1 1 1
 Occasional 83 14 17 2.01 (1.11–3.64) 1.82 (1.00–3.32) 1.45 (0.75–2.84)
 Severe 63 16 25 3.37 (1.87–6.06) 3.33 (1.83–6.05) 2.50 (1.29–4.85)
Bullying by superiors < 0.001 < 0.001 0.315
 No 1894 170 9 1 1 1
 Occasional 177 22 12 1.44 (0.90–2.31) 1.45 (0.90–2.34) 1.10 (0.65–1.85)
 Severe 101 24 24 3.16 (1.95–5.13) 3.26 (1.99–5.35) 1.55 (0.88–2.74)
Bullying by either/or < 0.001 < 0.001 0.085
 No 1816 156 9 1 1 1
 Occasional 216 29 13 1.65 (1.08–2.52) 1.62 (1.05–2.50) 1.27 (0.80–2.02)
 Severe 140 31 22 3.03 (1.97–4.66) 3.06 (1.97–4.75) 1.71 (1.04–2.82)

N = 2172

Model 0: Unadjusted model. Each bullying variable was introduced separately in the model

Model 1: Adjusted for gender, age and socio-economic status. Each bullying variable was introduced separately in the model

Model 2: Adjusted for gender, age, socio-economic status and PHQ at baseline. Each bullying variable was introduced separately in the model

*This p value denotes to what extent the whole categorical bullying variable is associated with self-reported depressive symptoms