Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;93(4):433–443. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01492-7

Table 3.

Prospective models for exposure to workplace bullying at baseline (2011/12) and physician-diagnosed depression between baseline and follow-up (2017) by type of perpetrator and severity

N Cases Cases (%) Self-reported physician-diagnosed depression
Model 0 Model 1 Model 2
p value* OR (95% CI) p value* OR (95% CI) p value* OR (95% CI)
Bullying by co-workers 0.001 0.002 < 0.001
 No 2024 166 8 1 1 1
 Occasional 82 13 16 2.11 (1.14–3.90) 1.98 (1.06–3.67) 1.60 (0.82–3.13)
 Severe 62 12 19 2.69 (1.40–5.14) 2.71 (1.40–5.24) 2.06 (1.01–4.18)
Bullying by superiors < 0.001 < 0.001 0.255
 No 1893 150 8 1 1 1
 Occasional 176 22 13 1.66 (1.03–2.67) 1.71 (1.05–2.76) 1.37 (0.82–2.28)
 Severe 99 19 19 2.76 (1.63–4.68) 2.86 (1.67–4.89) 1.48 (0.81–2.68)
Bullying by either/or 0.016 < 0.001 0.155
 No 1815 140 8 1 1 1
 Occasional 215 27 13 1.72 (1.11–2.66) 1.73 (1.11–2.70) 1.41 (0.88–2.25)
 Severe 138 24 17 2.52 (1.57–4.04) 2.59 (1.60–4.18) 1.52 (0.89–2.58)

N = 2168

Model 0: Unadjusted model. Each bullying variable was introduced separately in the model

Model 1: Adjusted for gender, age and socio-economic status. Each bullying variable was introduced separately in the model

Model 2: Adjusted for gender, age, socio-economic status and PHQ at baseline. Each bullying variable was introduced separately in the model

*This p value denotes to what extent the whole categorical bullying variable is associated with physician-diagnosed depression