Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Apr 2;9(14):e00020-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00020-20

Draft Genome Sequence of the Yeast Rhodotorula sp. Strain CCFEE 5036, Isolated from McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica

Claudia Coleine a, Sawyer Masonjones b, Silvano Onofri a, Laura Selbmann a,c,, Jason E Stajich b,
Editor: Antonis Rokasd
PMCID: PMC7118180  PMID: 32241854

A draft genome sequence was assembled and annotated of the basidiomycetous yeast Rhodotorula sp. strain CCFEE 5036, isolated from Antarctic soil communities. The genome assembly is 19.07 megabases and encodes 6,434 protein-coding genes. The sequence will contribute to understanding the diversity of fungi inhabiting polar regions.

ABSTRACT

A draft genome sequence was assembled and annotated of the basidiomycetous yeast Rhodotorula sp. strain CCFEE 5036, isolated from Antarctic soil communities. The genome assembly is 19.07 megabases and encodes 6,434 protein-coding genes. The sequence will contribute to understanding the diversity of fungi inhabiting polar regions.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Rhodotorula fungi are ubiquitous saprophytic yeasts taxonomically classified in the Pucciniomycotina and Ustilaginomycotina subphyla (phylum Basidiomycota) (1, 2). These fungi can be isolated from many environments and are often found associated with humans, animals, and food (3). Species have been described from the gut microbiota of carnivorous fish (4) and contaminated soil (5). Some members of this group are cryophilic extremophiles and can persist under extreme conditions (low temperature, high salinity, high pressure, and low pH) (611). The genome sequence of an Antarctic Rhodotorula isolate will be useful for comparative studies of evolution of extremophilic yeasts, in efforts to study their role in biogeochemical nutrient cycling in cold environments, and in bioprospecting for new enzymes (12, 13).

A Rhodotorula sp. culture was isolated from soil collected near a glacier during the XI Italian Antarctic Expedition (1995 to 1996) at Edmonson Point at 74°20′00″S, 165°08′00″E (Northern Victoria Land, Continental Antarctica), an Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA), following the protocol described by Selbmann et al. (14). Briefly, soil was sprinkled on petri dishes containing 2% malt extract agar (MEA; AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 100 ppm chloramphenicol and incubated at 10°C for several months. Yeast colonies were streaked onto fresh medium to isolate pure cultures. Rhodotorula sp. CCFEE 5036 strain culture is deposited in the Culture Collection of Fungi from Extreme Environments (CCFEE; University of Tuscia, Italy) and at the Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale e Agroambientale of the University of Perugia Industrial Yeasts Collection (DBVPG) as strain 5527. Genomic DNA was extracted from a pure culture grown for 3 weeks at 10°C on MEA following the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (15). The DNA was sheared with a Covaris S220 ultrasonicator, and a sequencing library was constructed using the Neoprep TruSeq nano DNA sample prep protocol (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) in a genomics core (Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside). The library was multiplexed and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq flow cell to obtain 6.1 million 2 × 300-bp paired-end sequence reads. FastQC (v0.11.3) was used to check read quality (16).

Genome assembly was performed with MaSuRCA (v2.3.2) (17) using default parameters (cgwErrorRate, 0.15), which included quality-based read trimming and corrections. Trimmed reads averaged 199 bp. Assembled scaffolds were filtered for vector contamination with Sequin (v15.10) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Sequin/), and redundant scaffolds were eliminated if they aligned with at least 95% identity to a longer contig with MUMMer (v3.23) (18), using the “clean” step in Funannotate (v0.5.5) (19). The assembly was 155 contigs and totaled 19.08 Mb in length (N50, 338 kb; L50, 19; longest scaffold, 930,366 bp; G+C content, 60.58%; average depth of coverage, 192×).

Genome annotation performed by Funannotate (v0.5.5) (19) produced consensus gene models by EVidenceModeler (EVM) (20), combining ab initio predictions from AUGUSTUS (v3.2.2) (21) and GeneMark.hmm-ES (v4.32) (22) with protein-to-genome alignments from Exonerate (v.2.2.0) (23). GeneMark.hmm-ES self-training used default parameters, and AUGUSTUS was trained with alignments of BUSCO basidiomycota_odb9 proteins (v9) (24) and gene prediction parameters archived in a GitHub repository (25). Gene functions were assigned by similarity to Pfam (26), MEROPS (27), CAZy (28, 29), eggNOG (v4.5) (30), InterProScan (31), and Swissprot (32) databases by BLASTP (v2.5.0+) or HMMER3 (33) searches using Funannotate default parameters. A total of 6,553 protein-coding genes were predicted and prepared for GenBank submission by Genome Annotation Generator (34).

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project was deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number MXAQ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, MXAQ01000000. Illumina sequence reads are released under SRA accession number SRR5223778 and associated with BioProject PRJNA342238.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Italian Antarctic National Museum (MNA) is kindly acknowledged for financial support to the Mycological Section on the MNA and for providing the strains sequenced in this study that are stored in the Culture Collection of Fungi from Extreme Environments (CCFEE) (University of Tuscia, Italy). J.E.S. is a CIFAR fellow in the Fungal Kingdom: Threats and Opportunities program. C.C. and L.S. kindly acknowledge the Italian National Program for Antarctic Researches (PNRA) for funding sampling campaigns and the research activities in Italy. Sequencing was supported through United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project CA-R-PPA-5062-H to J.E.S. Data analyses were performed on the High-Performance Computing Cluster at the University of California, Riverside, in the Institute of Integrative Genome Biology, supported by NSF DBI-1429826 and NIH S10-OD016290.

We declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

CC and LS kindly acknowledge the Italian National Program for Antarctic Researches (PNRA) for funding sampling campaigns and the research activities in Italy. Sequencing was supported through United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project CA-R-PPA-5062-H to JES. Data analyses were performed on the High-Performance Computing Cluster at the University of California-Riverside in the Institute of Integrative Genome Biology supported by NSF DBI-1429826 and NIH S10-OD016290.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aime MC, Toome M, McLaughlin DJ. 2014. Pucciniomycotina, p 271–294. In Systematics and evolution. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Urbina H, Aime MC. 2018. A closer look at Sporidiobolales: ubiquitous microbial community members of plant and food biospheres. Mycologia 110:79–92. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2018.1438020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Larone DH. 2011. Medically important fungi: a guide to identification, 5th ed ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raggi P, Lopez P, Diaz A, Carrasco D, Silva A, Velez A, Opazo R, Magne F, Navarrete PA. 2014. Debaryomyces hansenii and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa comprised the yeast core gut microbiota of wild and reared carnivorous salmonids, croaker and yellowtail. Environ Microbiol 16:2791–2803. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chandran P, Das N. 2012. Role of plasmid in diesel oil degradation by yeast species isolated from petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Environ Technol 33:645–652. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.587024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Feller G, Gerday C. 2003. Psychrophilic enzymes: hot topics in cold adaptation. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:200–208. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Margesin R, Fonteyne PA, Schinner F, Sampaio JP. 2007. Rhodotorula psychrophila sp. nov., Rhodotorula psychrophenolica sp. nov. and Rhodotorula glacialis sp. nov., novel psychrophilic basidiomycetous yeast species isolated from alpine environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2179–2184. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bergauer P, Fonteyne PA, Nolard N, Schinner F, Margesin R. 2005. Biodegradation of phenol and phenol-related compounds by psychrophilic and cold-tolerant alpine yeasts. Chemosphere 59:909–918. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goordial J, Raymond-Bouchard I, Riley R, Ronholm J, Shapiro N, Woyke T, LaButti KM, Tice H, Amirebrahimi M, Grigoriev IV, Greer C, Bakermans C, Whyte L. 2016. Improved high-quality draft genome sequence of the eurypsychrophile Rhodotorula sp. JG1b, isolated from permafrost in the hyperarid upper-elevation McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Genome Announc 4:e00069-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00069-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burgaud G, Arzur D, Durand L, Cambon-Bonavita M-A, Barbier G. 2010. Marine culturable yeasts in deep-sea hydrothermal vents: species richness and association with fauna. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:121–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sannino C, Tasselli G, Filippucci S, Turchetti B, Buzzini P. 2017. Yeasts in nonpolar cold habitats, p 367–396. In Yeasts in natural ecosystems: diversity. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raspor P, Zupan J. 2006. Yeasts in extreme environments In Peter G, Rosa C, ed, The Yeast handbook. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Foght J, Aislabie J, Turner S, Brown CE, Ryburn J, Saul DJ, Lawson W. 2004. Culturable bacteria in subglacial sediments and ice from two Southern Hemisphere glaciers. Microb Ecol 47:329–340. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-1036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Onofri S, Cecchini C, Isola D, Turchetti B, Buzzini P. 2014. Taxonomic and phenotypic characterization of yeasts isolated from worldwide cold rock-associated habitats. Fungal Biol 118:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD. 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13:207–209. doi: 10.1007/BF02670897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 17.Zimin AV, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA. 2013. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Palmer J, Stajich JE. 2017. Funannotate: eukaryotic genome annotation pipeline. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1134477. [DOI]
  • 20.Haas BJ, Salzberg SL, Zhu W, Pertea M, Allen JE, Orvis J, White O, Buell CR, Wortman JR. 2008. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol 9:R7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B. 2006. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W435–W439. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lomsadze A, Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Chernoff YO, Borodovsky M. 2005. Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res 33:6494–6506. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Slater GSC, Birney E. 2005. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 6:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stajich JE. 2018. hyphaltip/fungi-gene-prediction-params: fungi gene prediction set v.0.1.0. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1649679. [DOI]
  • 26.Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, Sonnhammer ELL, Tate J, Punta M. 2014. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D222–D230. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Finn R. 2016. Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D343–D350. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang L, Zhang H, Wu P, Entwistle S, Li X, Yohe T, Yi H, Yang Z, Yin Y. 2018. dbCAN-seq: a database of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) sequence and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D516–D521. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 2014. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D490–D495. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2016. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D286–D293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, Schneider M, Bansal P, Bridge AJ, Poux S, Bougueleret L, Xenarios I. 2016. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the manually annotated section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: how to use the entry view. Methods Mol Biol 1374:23–54. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eddy SR. 2011. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hall B, DeRego T, Geib S. 2014. Genome Annotation Generator: a simple tool for generating and correcting WGS annotation tables for NCBI submission. GigaScience 7:1–5. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This whole-genome shotgun project was deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number MXAQ00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, MXAQ01000000. Illumina sequence reads are released under SRA accession number SRR5223778 and associated with BioProject PRJNA342238.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES