. 2020 Mar 27;11:555. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00555

TABLE 4.

Summary of the linear hierarchical model of materialism and inclination for self–employer brand relationship (Incl-S-EB-R) as predictors of offer, brand and salary evaluations.

		Evaluation of SEBUAS offer				Evaluation of WEBAS offer
		B	SE B	β	p	B	SE B	β	p
		Attractiveness				Attractiveness
Step 1	Constant	6.99 [5.98, 7.85]	0.48		0.001	3.14 [1.89, 4.49]	0.61		0.001
	MAT	−0.53 [−0.75, −0.28]	0.115	−0.40****	0.001	0.31 [0.03, 0.55]	0.14	0.23*	0.02
Step 2	Constant	4.20 [2.64, 5.65]	0.89		0.001	3.81 [1.96, 6.05]	0.94		0.001
	MAT	−0.57 [−0.77, −0.36]	0.10	−0.43****	0.001	0.32 [0.03, 0.56]	0.14	0.235*	0.05
	Incl-S-EB-R	0.885 [0.47, 1.38]	0.22	0.36****	0.001	−0.21 [−0.79, 0.21]	0.26	–0.09	0.38
		R² = 0.16, F(1,98) = 18.63 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.13, F(2,98) = 19.99 for step 2 (all ps < 0.001).				R² = 0.05, F(1,99) = 5.41, p = 0.02 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.01, p = 0.38, F(2,98) = 3.09, p = 0.05 for step 2

		Perception of organizational fit				Perception of organizational fit

Step 1	Constant	6.03 [5.12, 6.905]	0.48		0.001	2.72 [1.87, 3.74]	0.50		0.001
	MAT	−0.305 [−0.55, −0.06]	0.12	−0.25**	0.01	0.14 [−0.10, 0.35]	0.11	0.13	0.19
Step 2	Constant	3.12 [1.37, 4.85]	0.97		0.001	3.52 [2.25, 5.29]	0.68		0.001
	MAT	−0.35 [−0.56, −0.13]	0.10	−0.29***	0.002	0.15 [−0.10, 0.37	0.12	0.14	0.15
	Incl-S-EB-R	0.92 [0.43, 1.45]	0.23	0.42****	0.001	−0.25 [−0.65, 0.03]	0.18	–0.14	0.18
		R² = 0.06, F(1,99) = 6.79, p = 0.01 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.18, F(2,98) = 15.59, ps < 0.001 for step 2.				R² = 0.02, F(1,99) = 1.76, p = 0.19 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.02, p = 0.18, F(2,98) = 1.815, p = 0.17 for step 2

		EB equity of strong EB				EB equity of weak EB

Step 1	Constant	6.24 [5.45, 7.06]	0.44		0.001	3.23 [2.34, 4.22]	0.50		0.001
	MAT	−0.27 [−0.49, −0.05]	0.11	−0.27**	0.01	0.10 [−0.13, 0.31]	0.11	0.10	0.315
Step 2	Constant	3.72 [2.52, 4.85]	0.61		0.001	3.58 [2.14, 5.06]	0.72		0.001
	MAT	−0.30 [−0.51, −0.09]	0.10	−0.30****	0.001	0.10 [−0.13, 0.33]	0.11	0.11	0.29
	Incl-S-EB-R	0.80 [0.51, 1.10]	0.14	0.44****	0.001	−0.11 [−0.52, 0.22]	0.19	–0.06	0.53
		R² = 0.07, F(1,99) = 7.67, p = 0.007 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.19, F(2,98) = 17.77, ps < 0.001 for step 2.				R² = 0.01, F(1,99) = 1.02, p = 0.315 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.004, F(2,98) = 0.70, p = 0.45 for step 2

		Attractiveness of low salary offered by strong EB				Attractiveness of high salary offered by weak EB

Step 1	Constant	4.60 [4.03, 5.24]	0.30		0.001	4.62 [4.13, 5.22]	0.26		0.001
	MAT	−0.60 [−0.73, −0.48]	0.07	−0.55****	0.001	−0.04 [−0.17, 0.07]	0.07	–0.06	0.55
Step 2	Constant	5.29 [3.78, 6.89]	0.77		0.001	4.39 [3.13, 6.07]	0.62		0.001
	MAT	−0.59 [−0.72, −0.48]	0.06	−0.54****	0.001	−0.04 [−0.17, 0.08]	0.07	–0.07	0.515
	Incl-S-EB-R	−0.22 [−0.565, 0.17]	0.19	–0.11	0.19	0.07 [−0.34, 0.34]	0.18	0.06	0.526
		R² = 0.30, F(1,99) = 42.57, p = 0.001 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.01, p = 0.19, F(2,98) = 22.30, p = 0.001 for step 2.				R² = 0.004, F(1,99) = 0.37, p = 0.55 for step 1; ΔR² = 0.004, p = 0.53, F(2,98) = 0.385, p = 0.68 for step 2

MAT, materialism; Incl-S-EB-R, Inclination for self–employer brand relationship; EB, employer brand; SEBUAS, job offer from a strong employer brand with an unattractive salary; WEBAS, job offer from a weak employer brand with an attractive salary. In square brackets, 95% bias corrected and accelerated confidence intervals reported are reported (confidence intervals and standard errors based on 1000 bootstrap samples). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.