Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 29;43(1):228–234. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1651

Table 3.

Comparison between insulin sensitivity tertiles

Low IS (n = 14) Mid IS (n = 15) High IS (n = 14) P value
Low vs. mid Mid vs. high Low vs. high
M value, mg/kglean/min 2.6 ± 0.9 5.2 ± 0.6 9.0 ± 2.0 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 33.3 ± 3.8 30.7 ± 3.9 29.5 ± 3.3 n.s. n.s. 0.027
SBP, mmHg* 145 ± 14 141 ± 17 150 ± 18 n.s. n.s. n.s.
DBP, mmHg 89 ± 8 83 ± 8 82 ± 6.1 n.s. n.s. n.s.
GFR, mL/min 129 ± 26 100 ± 20 103 ± 21 0.003 n.s. 0.010
ERPF, mL/min* 551 ± 105 464 ± 108 488 ± 107 n.s. n.s. n.s.
FF, % 23.3 ± 2.7 22.3 ± 2.4 20.7 ± 2.8 n.s. n.s. 0.039
ERBF, mL/min* 953 ± 193 786 ± 207 807 ± 189 n.s. n.s. n.s.
RVR, mmHg/L/min* 117 ± 24 139 ± 37 136 ± 34 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Albuminuria, mg/day*# 13.5 (9.0–64.5) 8.0 (3.3–13.3) 11.0 (6.5–18.1) n.s. n.s. n.s.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD or median (IQR) when nonparametric. Clinical characteristics and renal measures compared across tertiles of insulin sensitivity (IS) (lean M value). When one-way ANOVA was significant, individual tertiles were compared using the Bonferroni post hoc test. n.s., nonsignificant.

*

One-way ANOVA test nonsignificant, and individual tertiles were thus not compared.

#

Analyzed after ln-transformation. Significant differences indicated in boldface type.