Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;82(3):337–344. doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0028

Table 2. Comparison of haemodynamic variables (median and range) in dogs before and after a mini-fluid bolus (MFB) with 4 ml/kg Hartmann’s solution administered intravenously in 22 dogs.

Group Before fluid challenge
After fluid challenge
R NR P-valuea) R NR P-valuea)
Dogs (No.) 10 12 10 12
HR (beats/min) 135 (110–180) 108 (59–190) 0.03 127 (83–182) 98 (57–151) 0.05
SAP (mmHg) 141 (85–175) 152 (70–163) 0.563 140 (117–170) 148 (102–206) 0.88
MAP (mmHg) 103 (70–159) 110 (74–132) 0.315 105 (75–113) 110 (77–145) 0.575
VTI (cm) 8.5 (3.4–12.7) 12.1 (8–16.3) 0.005 11.8 (6–18) 12.3 (9–17) 0.878
CVC/Ao 0.59 (0.38–0.83) 0.90 (0.5–1.46) 0.001 0.83 (0.46–1.24) 0.97 (0.51–1.7) 0.044
cCVC 33 (11–57) 33 (10–71) 0.771 32 (18–37) 30 (6–77) 0.871

Data are presented as median (range). a) Two Tailed probability Mann–Whitney U test. Responders (R), Non-responders (NR). Heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), velocity time integral (VTI), caudal vena cava diameter to abdominal aortic diameter ratio (CVC/Ao), collapsibility of the caudal vena cava (cCVC).