Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 17;53:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102643

Table 2.

Performance of detecting TERT promotor mutation in the pre-diagnostic urine samples as an early detection biomarker for bladder cancer.

Statistics Urinary DNA (N = 131) 95% CI
All Pre-diagnostic samples
 True Positive (n) 14
 True Negative (n) 101
 False positive (n) 0
 False negative (n) 16
 Sensitivity (%) 46·67 28·34 – 65·67
 Specificity (%) 100·00 96·41 – 100·00
 Positive likelihood ratio (%)
 Negative likelihood ratio (%) 0·53 0·38 – 0·75
 Positive predictive value (%)a 100·00
 Negative predictive value (%)a 99·95 99·93 – 99·97
 Accuracy (%) 99·96 99·94 – 99·97
< 7 years prior diagnosisb
 True Positive (n) 08
 False Negative (n) 06
 Sensitivity (%) 57·14 28·86 – 82·34
> 7 years prior diagnosisb
 True Positive (n) 06
 False Negative (n) 10
 Sensitivity (%) 37·50 15·20 – 64·57
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
 True Positive (n) 03
 False Negative (n) 06
 Sensitivity (%) 33·33 7·49 – 70·07
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
 True Positive (n) 10
 False Negative (n) 06
 Sensitivity (%) 62·50 35·43 – 84·80

CI: Confidence Interval.

a

Positive and negative predictive values were calculated using the prevalence of bladder cancer (0·09%) in the Golestan population based cohort.

b

Median time to BC diagnosis.