Table 3.
Comparison of eQTL Mapping Results between GENOA and MESA
| Genes (or Gene-SNP Pairs) Analyzed in Both Studies | Detected in MESA | Detected in GENOA | Overlapped between the Two Studies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENOA AA (n = 1,205) versus MESA AFA (n = 233) | ||||
| eGenes | 9,221 | 4,275 | 3,722 | 1,377 |
| eSNPs | 5,038,835 | 197,277 | 195,747 | 49,096 |
| GENOA EA (n = 801) versus MESA CAU (n = 578) | ||||
| eGenes | 9,151 | 5,559 | 2,956 | 1,736 |
| eSNPs | 3,154,038 | 533,989 | 202,503 | 103,205 |
The first row shows the number of eGenes that are identified in GENOA AA and analyzed in MESA AFA (first column), the number of eGenes in AA that are also eGenes in MESA AFA (second column), the percentage of also eGenes in MESA AFA that are also eGenes in AA (third column), the number of eGenes that are identified in GENOA EA and analyzed in MESA CAU (first column), the number of eGenes in EA that are also eGenes in MESA CAU (second column), the percentage of also eGenes in MESA CAU that are also eGenes in EA (third column).