Table 3.

Associations between compliance of university students with preventive guidelines and affecting factors.

Factors	Complete compliance		Tamiflu consumption
	Odds ratio	95% CI	Odds ratio	95% CI
Gender	n = 198; R2 = 0.49		n = 226, R2 = 0.29
Female	–c	–c	–c	–c
Male	1.10	0.46–2.65	2.43a	1.26–4.71
Age (years)
17–20	–c	–c	–c	–c
21–22	1.11	0.33–3.77	0.48	0.21–1.06
≥23	0.82	0.20–3.34	0.51	0.19–1.38
Country of study
USA	–c	–c	–c	–c
Hong Kong	1.24	0.14–11.06	0.33	0.07–1.58
Singapore	4.59b	1.13–18.68	2.68b	1.04–6.91
Other	2.80	0.72–10.89	1.52	0.65–3.59
Hong Kong residency
No	–c	–c	–c	–c
Yes	0.56	0.12–2.69	0.46	0.17–1.29
Compliance with guidelines prior to arrival
Viewing health organization websites	1.21a	1.05–1.39	0.95	0.85–1.06
Offline, practice-based guidelines	1.36a	1.15–1.61	1.19a	1.07–1.33
Opinions on necessity of measures
Temperature checkpoints	1.48a	1.12–1.97	0.79a	0.67–0.94
Contingency measures	1.00	0.87–1.15	1.16a	1.05–1.29

CI, confidence interval.

^aP < 0.001.

^bP < 0.05.

^cReference.