Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 27;136(6):1442–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.044

Table 3.

Clinical outcomes of RFWB group versus component therapy (controls)

RFWB (n = 31) Control (n = 33) P value
Primary outcome measures
 Chest tube loss 0–4 h CCCU, mL/kg (range) 7.1 (0.6–30.0) 5.7 (1.8–45.6) .76
 Chest tube loss 4–24 h CCCU, mL/kg (range) 7.7 (2.0–34.6) 11.8 (4.0–44.1) .03
 Bleeding assessed as moderate or severe 17 (55%) 27 (82%) .03
Secondary outcome measures
 Inotropic support score (ISS) at 4 h CCCU 6.6 (0–20.0) 9.5 (0–20.0) .53
 Inotropic support score (ISS) at 24 h CCCU 3.3 (0–9.9) 6.6 (0–14.9) .002
 Ventilation in hours, median (range) 119 (28–480) 164 (54–912) .04
 CCCU LOS in days, median (range) 5 (3–20) 7 (1–39) .17
 Hospital LOS in days, median (range) 12 (6–36) 18 (7–79) .02
Transfusion characteristics
 Blood produce exposure, mean units ± SD 3.2 ± 1.9 6.9 ± 3.8 <.0001
 Transfusion requirements postop, mL/kg (range) 33 (0–177) 43 (4–160) .55
 Age of donor blood products, days 1.9 ± 0.3 13.6 ± 7.7 <.0001

RFWB, Reconstituted fresh whole blood; CCCU, cardiac critical care unit; LOS, length of stay; SD, standard deviation.