Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 27;32(6):327–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.03.006

Table 1.

Composite scores by emergency management area and median scores for Kentucky

EMA General response External traffic flow Media Reception of casualties Communication and resource cut off Pharmaceutical plan N
1 0.80 0.81 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.21 4
2 0.80 0.88 0.78 0.93 0.88 0.33 9
3 0.75 0.88 0.78 0.93 0.50 0.17 5
4 0.45 0.63 0.78 0.96 0.50 0.50 9
5 0.63 0.56 0.50 0.79 0.38 0.00 6
6 0.84 0.63 0.83 0.86 0.80 0.67 16
7 0.63 0.50 0.44 0.57 0.88 0.00 7
8 0.60 0.63 0.78 0.89 0.50 0.33 5
9 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.96 0.88 0.17 9
10 0.74 0.75 0.61 0.88 0.88 0.17 4
11 0.73 0.75 0.61 0.98 0.31 0.33 7
12 0.75 0.75 0.44 0.82 0.50 0.33 8
13 0.65 0.75 0.88 0.86 0.50 0.42 16
14 0.69 0.63 0.72 0.71 0.75 0.33 6
KY Med 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.89 0.75 0.33 111

EMA, Emergency management area; Med, median; N, number of hospitals in each EMA.

Median scores calculated from index scores ranging from 0 to 1 for each EMA, with 0 being least prepared and 1 best prepared. Higher scores indicate that hospitals in the EMA are better prepared to respond.