Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;21:276. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6691-0

Table 2.

Tests for positive selection among TaDofs gene family using site-specific models

Models np Estimates of parametersa lnL 2△lnL Positively selected sitesb

M0

(one-ratio)

191 ω = 0.05384 − 4539.929 883.03 (M3 vs M0) Not allowed

M3

(discrete)

195

p0 = 0.43174, p1 = 0.26150, p2 = 0.30676 ω1 = 0.00039,

ω2 = 0.03024,

ω3 = 0.23081

− 4098.415 None

M7

(beta)

192 p = 0.19976, q = 2.34994 − 4083.224 2036.983 (M8 va M7) Not allowed

M8

(beta & ω)

194 p0 = 0.99999, p = 0.82856, q = 1.22843(p1 = 0.00001), ω = 2.55223 − 5101.716 30A**, 31 T**, 33A**, 45 K, 67S, 82H, 85S, 102G*, 103 T, 104S**, 105D

Note: *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01 (χ2 test). lnL, log likelihood. 2△lnL, twice the log-likelihood difference of the models. a, ω was estimated under model M0, M3, M7, M8. b, the number of amino acid sites estimated to have undergone positive selection. np, number of free parameters