Table 4.
The differential Taxa of Bacteria Among Three Study Groups
Taxa | Erosive OLP | Non-erosive OLP | Control | p. value |
---|---|---|---|---|
g_Neisseria | 1.85 ± 0.71 | 6.19 ± 3.60 | 5.75 ± 1.65 | < 0.001 |
g_Abiotrophia | 0.18 ± 0.16 | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 1.75 ± 1.48 | < 0.001 |
g_Haemophilus | 0.78 ± 0.24 | 2.76 ± 1.02 | 1.03 ± 0.53 | < 0.001 |
g_Spirochaetes | 0.26 ± 0.12 | 0.08 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.15 | < 0.001 |
g_Oribacterium | 1.61 ± 0.97 | 1.99 ± 1.41 | 0.44 ± 0.59 | < 0.01 |
f_Aerococcaceae | 0.42 ± 0.19 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 1.93 ± 1.51 | < 0.001 |
o_Spirochaetales | 0.27 ± 0.12 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.22 ± 0.15 | < 0.01 |
Data was presented as mean ± SD, which was the log value from the Mean Decrease Gini index of each group, developed from the operational taxonomic unit (OTU)-level abundances (read abundance %) analyzed by Random Forest classification. The higher the value, the less read abundance the bacteria