Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 15;2014(9):CD008990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008990.pub3

Chen 2005.

Methods RCT
Participants 219 adults enrolled in the study, from a burn centre in China. 12 people were lost; 207 people were analysed. Mean age: 36 years; 168 males, 39 females. Mean TBSA 61.5%; mean TBSA second‐degree burn 32%; mean TBSA third‐degree burn 19.6%. Included scalds, flame burns, chemical burns and electric burns. people with severe associated injuries were excluded.
Interventions rhGH 0.19 IU/kg/day (Gene Science®) (n = 112) or placebo saline (n = 95) were administered daily by subcutaneous injection morning or night beginning after a mean of 7.3 (SD = 2.8) days after injury and continuing for 10 to 16 days
Outcomes Mortality, hyperglycaemia (fasting blood‐glucose ≥ 10 mmol/L), septicaemia
Funding  
Notes Article in Chinese. Informed consent for the study was obtained from participants or relatives.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Randomised blocks", no further details reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Method of blinding not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 219 adults were enrolled in the study, 12 participants were lost or rejected and 207 participants were analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear. Study protocol was not available.