Table 3.
Prevalence of KIV and WUV by the different PCR assays evaluated in this study.
| KI-A |
KI-B |
KI-C |
WU-A |
WU-B |
WU-C |
WU-D |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | Positive samples (%) | Negative samples (%) | |
| Stool (N = 84) | 17 (20.2%) | 67 (79.8%) | 18 (21.4%) | 66 (78.6%) | 26 (31.0%) | 58 (69.0%) | 6 (7.1%) | 78 (92.9%) | 6 (7.1%) | 78 (92.9%) | 7 (8.3%) | 77 (91.7%) | 21 (25.0%) | 63 (75.0%) |
| Tonsils (N = 91) | 0 (0%) | 91 (100%) | 12 (13.2%) | 79 (86.8%) | 12 (13.2%) | 79 (86.8%) | 0 (0%) | 91 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 91 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 91 (100%) | 4 (4.4%) | 87 (95.6%) |