Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 10;2013(9):CD002817. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002817.pub4

Ashburn 2007.

Methods Parallel group design.
Stratified by NHS using blocks of size four. Random allocation by telephoning the medical statistics group at University of Southampton. Participants were informed of their allocation by telephone.
Data analysed on an intention‐to‐treat basis.
Treated as outpatients 7 times a week for a 6‐week period, for a total period of 42 hours.
Assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.
Participants 70 participants in the exercise group and 72 in the control group. 6 dropouts in the exercise group and 8 in the control group.
Participants' mean age 72.7 years (exercise), 71.6 years (control); male/female 38/32 (exercise), 48/24 (control); Hoehn and Yahr stage 3.14 (exercise), 3.11 (control); duration of PD 7.7 years (exercise), 9 years (control).
Inclusion criteria: confirmed diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, independently mobile, living at home in the community, experienced more than one fall in the previous 12 months, passed a screening for gross cognitive impairment (Mini‐Mental State). Exclusion criteria: unable to participate in assessments because of pain, acute medical condition, in receipt of or soon to receive treatment.
Interventions Exercise: personalised home‐based exercise and strategy programme. After assessment, treatment goals were established with participants, and exercises from the exercise menu were taught. Participants were visited weekly at home by a physiotherapist for approximately 1 hour. 6 levels of exercise progression comprised muscle strengthening, range of movement, balance training, and walking. Strategies of falls prevention and movement initiation and compensation taught by physiotherapist. Participants were asked to complete the exercises daily for max of 1 hour and to keep a record. Phoned monthly to encourage exercises.
Control: usual care, contact with local Parkinson's disease nurse.
Drug therapy was not described.
Outcomes Self‐reported falls diary.
Functional reach.
Timed up and go test.
Chair stand test.
Berg balance test.
Euroqol‐5d, QoL thermometer.
Self‐assessment Parkinson's disease disability scale.
Tests were carried out midway between drug doses.
Notes At 6 months, 34% in the control group were participating in extra rehabilitation compared with 25% in the exercise group.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Eligibility Criteria Low risk  
Randomisation Method Low risk Block randomisation (block size 4).
Concealment of Allocation Low risk Telephone call to central office.
Similarity at Baseline Low risk  
Withdrawals Described Low risk 6% at 8 weeks and 8% at 6 months.
Intention To Treat Analysis Low risk Analysis was on an intention‐to‐treat basis.
Cointerventions Constant Unclear risk Drug therapy was not described.
Credible Placebo Low risk Controls had contact with Parkinson's disease nurse.
Blinded Assessors Unclear risk Assessor remained blind to group allocation but reported being aware of the allocation of 18 exercise and 11 control participants at 8 weeks, and 25 exercise and 14 control participants at 6 months.