Skip to main content
. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3

Comparison 9. Hypnosis plus audio CD/tape versus hypnosis no audio CD/tape versus nurse/audio CD only (subgroup analysis).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Use of pharmacological pain relief/anaesthesia 6 2499 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.85, 1.17]
1.1 Hypnosis plus audio CD/tape 4 2173 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.73, 1.10]
1.2 Hypnosis, no audio CD/tape 2 107 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.50 [0.57, 3.93]
1.3 Nurse/audio CD only 1 219 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.86, 1.18]
2 Spontaneous vaginal birth 6 2504 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.95, 1.26]
2.1 Hypnosis plus audio CD/tape 4 2178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.90, 1.15]
2.2 Hypnosis, no audio CD/tape 2 107 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.64 [0.79, 3.42]
2.3 Nurse/audio CD only 1 219 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.77, 1.22]