Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 7;2010(7):CD002839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002839.pub2

Potter 2009 labetalol.

Methods Multicentre, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled 
 Randomisation by secure Internet central randomisation (with block size of 6) 
 ITT analysis
Participants UK 
 172 patients: T: 56, C: 29 
 Mean age: 74 years 
 Male 57% 
 Inclusion: > 18 years of age, fixed neurological deficit > 60 minutes, clinical diagnosis of acute stroke 
 Enrolment within 36 hours of ictus
Interventions Labetalol 50 mg po or matching placebo was initially given with the opportunity to repeat this at 4 hours and 8 hours after randomisation 
 Thereafter patients were continued on 50 to 150 mg of labetalol twice daily for 2 weeks, including for dysphagic patients (after 72 hours intravenous labetalol was converted to oral or nasogastric labetalol depending on swallowing status in dysphagic patients)
Outcomes Death or dependency at 2 weeks 
 Supine BP was measured with a validated A&D UA‐767 BP monitor with a cuff of a suitable size
Notes Ex: hypertensive encephalopathy, co‐existing cardiac or vascular emergency, SBP > 200 mmHg and/or DBP > 120 mmHg in association with primary intracerebral haemorrhage, pre‐existing antihypertensive therapy in patients without dysphagia, impaired level of consciousness, contraindication to trial therapy, premorbid mRS > 3, coexisting life threatening condition with life expectancy < 6 months, diagnosis of non‐stroke on subsequent neuroimaging
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Randomly assigned by secure Internet central randomisation (with a block size of 6)
Allocation concealment? Low risk Probably done
Blinding? Low risk Probably done
Completeness of follow‐up High risk 179 patients randomly assigned, 6 withdrawn due to a protocol violation or non‐stroke diagnosis and 1 withdrew consent