Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD002823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002823.pub2

1. Results of stratified analyses of pain outcomes.

Variable N of trials N of patients 
 (experimental) N of patients 
 (control) Pain intensity Heterogeneity P for interaction
  n n n SMD (95% CI) I2 (%)  
All trials 16 440 286  ‐0.86 (‐1.23 to ‐0.49) 80%  
Allocation concealment           0.47
Adequate 2 79 39 ‐0.52 (‐0.91 to ‐0.13) 0%  
Inadequate or unclear 14 361 247 ‐1.03 (‐1.49 to ‐0.57) 84%  
Type of control intervention*           0.12
Sham intervention 12 354 216 ‐1.13 (‐1.59 to ‐0.67) 82%  
No control intervention 5 86 70 ‐0.31 (‐0.80 to 0.19) 58%  
Blinding of patients           0.37
Adequate 11 309 205 ‐1.05 (‐1.52 to ‐0.59) 82%  
Inadequate or unclear 6 131 79 ‐0.63 (‐1.31 to 0.05) 81%  
Use of analgesic cointerventions           0.36
Similar between groups 4 124 83 ‐0.57 (‐1.16 to 0.02) 74%  
Not similar or unclear 12 316 23 ‐1.10 (‐1.60 to ‐0.59) 84%  
Intention‐to‐treat analysis           0.73
Yes 3 83 63 ‐0.76 (‐1.43 to ‐0.09) 72%  
No or unclear 13 357 223 ‐1.00 (‐1.48 to ‐0.53) 84%  
Type of ES**           0.94
High frequency TENS 8 177 139 ‐0.82 (‐1.51 to ‐0.12) 86%  
Burst TENS 2 39 38 ‐0.85 (‐1.32 to ‐0.38) 0%  
Modulation TENS 1 13 3 ‐1.41 (‐2.92 to 0.10) N/A  
Low frequency TENS 3 46 40 ‐0.82 (‐1.29 to ‐0.34) 0%  
Interferential current stimulation 4 88 44 ‐1.20 (‐1.99 to ‐0.42) 71%  
Pulsed ES 2 77 52 ‐0.41 (‐0.77 to ‐0.05) 0%  
Duration of ES per session†           0.69‡
≤ 20 minutes 8 166 112 ‐0.95 (‐1.55 to ‐0.35) 78%  
30 to 40 minutes 6 156 99 ‐1.45 (‐2.28 to ‐0.62) 85%  
≥ 60 minutes 4 118 91 ‐0.47 (‐0.96 to 0.02) 58%  
Number of sessions per week           0.90‡
≤ 3 6 163 91 ‐0.81 (‐1.48 to ‐0.14) 82%  
4 to 6 7 182 125 ‐1.33 (‐2.11 to ‐0.54) 88%  
≥ 7 3 96 70 ‐0.51 (‐0.83 to ‐0.19) 0%  
Duration of ES per week***           0.74‡
≤1 hour 5 123 71 ‐0.85 (‐1.72 to 0.01) 86%  
> 1 to 5 hours 8 180 122  ‐1.42 (‐2.11 to ‐0.74) 81%  
> 5 hours 5 137 109 ‐0.53 (‐0.96 to ‐0.11) 55%  
Duration of treatment period           0.14
< 4 weeks 7 190 114 ‐1.39 (‐2.13 to ‐0.66) 86%  
≥ 4 weeks 9 250 172 ‐0.64 (‐1.06 to ‐0.22) 75%  

ES: electrostimulation; *In Cheing 2002, two independent comparisons contributed in the two different strata. **Adedoyin 2005, Grimmer 1992 and Law 2004 contributed to two, two and three different strata: high‐frequency TENS and interferential current stimulation, high‐frequency TENS and burst, and high‐, low‐frequency and modulation TENS, respectively. † = Cheing 2003 contributed to all three different strata, with the same 8 control patients displayed in each stratum. ‡ = P values from test for trend.