Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD002823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002823.pub2

Garland 2007.

Methods Randomised multicentre controlled trial 
 2‐arm parallel group design 
 Number of participating centres: 3 
 Trial duration: 12 weeks 
 Randomisation stratified according to study site 
 No power calculation reported
Participants 100 patients randomised 
 58 patients with knee OA reported at baseline; 41 out of 58 candidates for total knee arthroplasty 
 Study joints: 58 knees 
 Number of females: 38 of 58 (66%) 
 Average age: 66 
 Disease duration: 8.4 years
Interventions Experimental intervention: pulsed electrical stimulation 
 Control intervention: sham intervention 
 Duration of treatment period: 12 weeks 
 Analgesics allowed and intake assessed, but unclear whether intake was similar.
Device: BIO‐1000 
 Self‐administered: yes 
 Waveform: unclear 
 Pulse width: unclear 
 Pulse frequency: 100 Hz 
 Amplitude: below sensory threshold, initial increase of amplitude up to 12 Volt until a tingling sensation was felt then reduction of the amplitude until this sensation disappeared  
 Duration of stimulation per session: 8.2 hours in active group, 7.8 hours in sham group (mean daily application time) 
 Electrodes: flexible electrodes embedded in garment, type not reported 
 Electrode placement: negative electrode at patella, positive over anterior distal thigh
Outcomes Extracted pain outcome: global pain after 12 weeks, described as "Considering your pain and symptoms in your study joint how are you doing today? (VAS)" 
 Extracted function outcome: WOMAC disability subscore after 12 weeks (VAS)
No primary outcome reported
Notes *Due to major protocol violations, all 42 randomised patient of one site were excluded by Garland et al
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Random number table
Allocation concealment? Low risk Central randomisation
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Quote: "Total WOMAC scores were not a defined outcome in the protocol, but are shown in Tables II(a)‐(d)."
Adequate blinding of patients? Low risk Use of sham device: BIO‐1000, indistinguishable from active device, with automatic shut‐off as soon as amplitude is reduced (all patients were instructed to reduce intensity just below perception level). Further adjustments required all devices to be restarted.
Incomplete outcome reporting: intention‐to‐treat analysis performed? 
 Pain High risk Due to major protocol violations, all 42 randomised patient of 1 site were excluded by original authors. From the other site, all patients randomised were included in the analysis.
Incomplete outcome reporting: intention‐to‐treat analysis performed? 
 Function High risk See above
Funding by commercial organisation avoided? High risk Sponsor: BioniCare Medical Technologies
Funding by non‐profit organisation? Unclear risk No information provided