Abstract
Three main questions are raised in this chapter.
1. The part of the signal of the NDT which is demographically identifiable, based on the proportion of the immature skeletons in cemeteries, shows that a baby-boom occurred and, beyond that, with the onset of the change in the economic system, a fertility transition towards high values also occurred. What was the biodemographic cause of this fertility explosion, beyond the proxy variable represented by sedentarism? The cause is a major shift in the maternal energetics of farming communities relative to mobile foragers. In the energy balance there was (i) on the intake side, an underlying trend towards a reduction in low-calorie food from hunting and fishing, and a correlative increase in high-calorie food from agriculture, (ii) on the expenditure side, a reduction in the physical energy devoted to mobility and the maternal stress of child transportation.
2. The NDT is detectable from a signal representing a fertility transition, but the transition relating to mortality is missing and must be inferred. If, during the fertility transition, mortality had remained the same as in the preceding forager period, then the population would have grown infinitely. The assumption of unchanged mortality during the entire fertility transition is therefore not realistic. Mortality, in its turn, must have begun to rise well before the end of the fertility transition. But when? Why? One of the answers consists of a model where, except at the start of the process, birth and mortality rates rise more or less simultaneously, bringing about a typical rate of increase for pre-industrial populations of slightly above zero.
3. According to the level and speed of the population growth, what should we expect in terms of population structure? What are the expected effects of this growth, not only on the population in numbers but also on age distribution, the distribution and structure of families, the distribution of households and on family systems?
Keywords: Neolithic demographic transition, fertility explosion, maternal energetics, farming, mobile foragers, western North American Indian Sample
Contributor Information
Jean-Pierre Bocquet-Appel, Email: jean-pierre.bocquet-appel@evolhum.cnrs.fr.
Ofer Bar-Yosef, Email: obaryos@fas.harvard.edu.
Jean-Pierre Bocquet-Appel, Email: bocquet-appel@ivrycnrs.fr.
References
- Bandy MS. New World Settlement Evidence for a Two-Stage Neolithic Demographic Transition. Current Anthropology. 2005;46(S):S109–S115. doi: 10.1086/497665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Belfer-Cohen A, Bar-Yosef O. Early sedentism in the Near East. A bumpy ride to village life: in: In: Kuijt I, editor. Life in Neolithic farming communities. New York, Kluwer/plenum.: Social organization, identity and differentiation:; 2000. pp. 19–38. [Google Scholar]
- Binford L. Post-Pleistocene adaptations. In ( In: Binford L., Binford S., editors. New Perspectives in Archaeology: Chicago: Aldine Press; 1968. pp. 313–341. [Google Scholar]
- Binford LR, Chasko WJ. Nunamiut demography history: A provocative case. In: Zubrow EBW, editor. In Demographic Anthropology: Quantitative Approaches. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press:; 1976. pp. 63–143. [Google Scholar]
- Bleek D. The Naron: A Busman tribe of the Central Kalahari. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1928. [Google Scholar]
- Blum A, N Bonneuil et, Blanchet D, editors. Modèles de la démographie historique. Congrès et colloques 11. Paris.: Ined, Puf:; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Blurton Jones N. Busman birth spacing: A test for optimal interbirth intervals. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1986;7:91–105. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(86)90002-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Blurton Jones, Sibly R. Testing adaptiveness of culturally determined behavior. Do bushman women maximize their reproductive success by spacing births widely and foraging seldom ? in. In: N Blurton Jones, Reynolds V., editors. Human behavior and adaptation. London: Taylor and Francis:; 1978. pp. 135–157. [Google Scholar]
- Bocquet-Appel JP. Paleoanthropological traces of Neolithic demographic transition. Current Anthropology. 2002;43:638–650. doi: 10.1086/342429. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bocquet-Appel JP, Naji S. Testing the Hypothesis of a Worldwide Neolithic Demographic Transition. Corroboration from American Cemeteries (with comments) Current Anthropology. 2006;47(2):341–365. doi: 10.1086/498948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bocquet-Appel JP, Demars PY, Noiret L, Dobrowsky D. Estimates of Upper Palaeolithic meta-population size in Europe from archaeological data. Journal of Archeaological Science. 2005;32:1656–1668. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bocquet-Appel JP y M Paz de Miguel Ibanez. 2002. Demografia de la difusion neolitica en Europe y los datos paleoantropologicos. Saguntum 5: 23–44.
- Boone JL. Subsistence strategies and early human population history: An evolutionary ecological perspective. World Archaeology. 2002;34(1):6–25. doi: 10.1080/00438240220134232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carr-Saunders AM. The population problem: A study in human evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1922. [Google Scholar]
- Coale A. The history of the human population. Scientific American. 1974;231(3):41–51. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0974-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen MN. The Food Crisis in Prehistory. New-Haven CN.: Yale University Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Diaz S. Determinants of lactational amenorrhea. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1989;1:83–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Direction de la Statistique et des Comptes Nationaux. 1977. L’emploi, le chomage et les conditions d’activité dans la communauté urbaine de Niamey. République du Niger.
- Dumond DE. The limitation of human population: A Natural History. Science. 1975;187:713–721. doi: 10.1126/science.1090000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellison PT. Advances in Human reproductive ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1994;23:225–275. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.001351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellison PT, Panter-Brick C, Lipson SF, O’Rourke MR. The ecological context of human ovarian function. Human Reproduction. 1993;8(12):2248–2258. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fink AE, Fink G, Wilson H, Bennie J, Carroll S, Dick H. Lactation, nutrition and fertility and the secretion of prolactin and gonadotrophins in Mopan Mayan women. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1992;24:35–52. doi: 10.1017/S0021932000006787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero EV, S Naji and JP Bocquet-Appel. 2008. The Signal of the Neolithic Demographic Transition in the Levant. In The Neolithic demographic transition and its consequences. Bocquet-Appel JP and O Bar Yosef (eds). 57–80.
- Hassan HF. Demographic Archaeology. New York.: Academic Press; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Hayden B. Resources, rivalry, and reproduction: the influence of basic resource characteristics on reproductive behavior. In: Handwerker P, editor. In Culture and Reproduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Hinde A. Demographic methods. London.: Arnold:; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Huffman SL, Chowdhury A, Allen H, Nahar L. Suckliong patterns and post-partum amenorrhoea in Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1987;19:171–179. doi: 10.1017/S0021932000016771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen JG. Western Indians Comparative Environments, Languages, and Cultures of 172 Western American Indian Societies. San Francisco: Freeman; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen JG. Codebook for Western Indians Data. World Cultures. 1999;10(2):144–293. [Google Scholar]
- Konner M, Worthman C. Nursing frequency, gonadal function and birth spacing among !Kung hunter-gatherers. Science. 1980;207:788–791. doi: 10.1126/science.7352291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuijt I., editor. Life in Neolithic Farming communities. Plenum, New York.: Social organization, identity and differentiation; 2000a. [Google Scholar]
- Kuijt I. People and space in early agricultural villages: Exploring daily lives, community size, and architecture in the Late Pre-Pottery Neolithic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2000b;19:75–102. doi: 10.1006/jaar.1999.0352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kuijt I, Goring-Morris N. Foraging, farming, and social complexity in the pre-pottery Neolithic of the Southern Levant: A review and Synthesis. Journal of World Prehistory. 2002;16(4):361–440. doi: 10.1023/A:1022973114090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee R. 1972a. Population growth and the beginning of sedentary life among the !Kung bushmen. In: Population Growth: Anthropological implications, B Spooner ed. Cambridge MIT Press: 329–342.
- Lee R. 1972b. The intensification of social life among the !Kung bushmen. In: Population Growth: Anthropological implications, B Spooner ed. Cambridge MIT Press: 343–350.
- Lee R. The !Kung San: Men, Women and Work in a Foraging Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Lee RD. Population dynamics of humans and other animals. Demography. 1987;24(4):443–465. doi: 10.2307/2061385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis PR, Borown JB, Renfree MB, Short RV. The resumption of ovulation and menstruation in a well-nourished population of women breastfeeding for an extended period of time. Fertility and Sterility. 1991;33(3):259–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lunn PG, Austin S, Prentice AM, Whitehead RG. The effect of improved nutrition on plasma prolactin concentrations and postpartum infertility in lactating Gambian women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1984;39:227–235. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/39.2.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malthus T.R. First essay on population. Reprinted for the Royal Economic Society. London: MacMillan and Co Publ.:; 1798. [Google Scholar]
- McNicoll G. Consequences of rapid population growth: an overview and assessment. Population and Development Review. 1984;10(2):177–240. doi: 10.2307/1973081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mira A, Pusker R, Rodriguez-Valera F. The Neolithc Revolution of bacterial genomes. Trends in Microbiology. 2006;14(5):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murdock GPWhite DR. Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology. 1969;8:329–369. doi: 10.2307/3772907. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng YK, Hight-Laukaran V, Peterson AE, Perez-Escamilla R. Maternal nutritional status is inversely associated with lactational amenorrhea in Sub-Saharan Africa: results from demographic and health surveys II and III. Journal of Nutrition. 1998;128(10):1672–1680. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.10.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pressat R. Demographic analysis. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton; 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Reher DS, Ortega Osona JA. Malthus revisited: Exploring medium-range interaction between economic and demographic forces in historic Europe. In: Bengtsson T, Saito O, editors. Population and Economy: From hunger to modern economic growth. Oxford UK.: Oxford University Press:; 2000. pp. 183–212. [Google Scholar]
- Romaniuk A. Increase in natural fertility during the early stages of modernization: Canadian Indians case study. Demography. 1981;18(2):157–172. doi: 10.2307/2061090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth EA. Sedentism and changing fertility patterns in Northern Athapascan Isolate. Journal of Human Evolution. 1981;10:413–425. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2484(81)80005-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roth EA. A note on the demographic concomitants of sedentism. American Anthropologist, New series. 1985;87(2):380–382. doi: 10.1525/aa.1985.87.2.02a00120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roth EA, AK Ray. Demographic patterns of sedentary and nomadic Juang of Orissa. Human Biology. 1985;57(3):319–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saucier JF. Correlates of the long postpartum taboo: a cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology. 1972;13(2):238–249. doi: 10.1086/201273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sibly RM, Hone J, Clutton-Brock TH. Wildlife population growth rates. Cambridge.: Cambridge University Press:; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Sussman RW. Child transport, family size and the increase in human population size during the Neolithic. Current Anthropology. 1972;13:258–259. doi: 10.1086/201274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tay CCK, Glasier AF, McNeilly AS. Twenty-four hour patterns of prolactin secretion during lactation and the relationship to suckling and the resumption of fertility in breast-feeding women. Human Reproduction. 1996;11(5):950–955. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valeggia C, Ellison PT. Lactational amenorrhoea in well-nourished Toba women of Formosa, Argentina. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2004;36:573–595. doi: 10.1017/S0021932003006382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitzthum VJ. Comparative study of breastfeeding structure and its relation to human reproductive ecology. The American Journal of Physical Anthropology Yearbook Series. 1994;37(S19):307–349. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330370611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson CP Airey. How can a homeostatic perspective enhance demographic transition theory? Population Studies. 1999;53(2):117–128. doi: 10.1080/00324720308076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wood JW. Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, Demography. New York.: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Wood JW, D Lai, PL Johnson, KL Campbell, IA Maslar. Lactation and birth spacing in Highland New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Science Supplement. 1985;9:159–173. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000025190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Worthman CM, Jenkins CL, Stallings JF, Lai D. Attenuation of nursing-related ovarian suppression and high fertility in well-nourished, intensively breast-feeding Amele women of Lowland Papua New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1993;25:425–443. doi: 10.1017/S0021932000021817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
