Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2019 Jun 22;260:133–160. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.06.023

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(a) Representative isochrons for canonical CAIs (e.g. Jacobsen et al. 2008; MacPherson et al. 2010) and the ranges from Semarkona (LL3.01), Yamato 81020 (CO3.05), and Acfer 094 (ungr. C3.00) chondrite chondrules (Hutcheon and Hutchison 1989; Kita et al. 2000; Kunihiro et al. 2004; Kurahashi et al. 2008a; Rudraswami et al. 2008; Villeneuve et al. 2009; Hutcheon et al. 2009; Ushikubo et al. 2013). *δ26Mg is defined in Section 2.5.1 of the main text. Slopes of isochrons correspond to inferred (26Al/27Al)0. (b) CR chondrite chondrule (26Al/27Al)0 values (symbols) versus the range of chondrule (26Al/27Al)0 from LL3, CO3, and Acfer 094 chondrites (gray shading and dashed lines). Relative ages are calculated using the canonical (26Al/27Al)0 shown in (a), and a 26Al half-life of 0.705 Myr (Norris et al. 1983). For CR chondrite chondrule data, references 1–4 correspond to Schrader et al. (2017), Nagashima et al. (2014), Hutcheon et al. (2009), and Kurahashi et al. (2008b), respectively. Closed and open symbols correspond to chondrules with and without resolvable excess 26Mg, respectively. Three chondrules from Hutcheon et al. (2009) were re-measured by Nagashima et al. (2014); only the data from the latter study are shown. (26Al/27Al)0 values and uncertainties from Hutcheon et al. (2009) were determined using Isoplot. Data from Kurahashi et al. (2008b) with unresolvable excess 26Mg are only reported as (26Al/27Al)0 upper limits (hence, no symbols are shown).